[Ger-Poland-Volhynia] KRUGER - HUFF (Gulewo)

John Marsch jmarsch at t2.net
Wed Dec 19 06:51:55 PST 2001

       To add to Jerry's comments, it has been my experience that our
ancestors were pretty cavalier about the accuracy of dates even with their
own age and  wedding anniversaries.
        I base this observation primarily from Polish records I am presently
preparing for the SGGEE Research Database where the recorded age of an
individual can vary up 6 or 8 years from one event to another.  Probably the
most accurate and dependable date, as Jerry points out,  is a birth date on
the original record, assuming it has been recorded within a span of a few
days of the actual event.

John Marsch


    >At 07:47 PM 18/12/2001 -0700, you wrote:
>>I am somewhat puzzled over a birthdate I show for Augustyne Kruger born in
>>Bycz - November 15, 1861.
>>The information I received from the SGGEE ged shows a birth date of
>>9, 1861.  Would this be a baptism date?
>As Rose suggested, you need to look at the original record.  And perhaps
>you need to question the source for both dates.  For example, parts of the
>SGGEE ged are from extractions while other parts are from data submitted by
>other members.  Similarly, did the Nov 15 date come from a record or from
>family practice.
>The rule of thumb is, the closer you get to the original date with a
>written record, the more accurate it is likely to be.  So a birth date on
>an infant baptism record is likely to be more accurate than one on a
>wedding record.  A birth date recorded in a diary the day after a birth is
>likely to be more accurate than the civil registration record created a
>couple of weeks later.  And so on.
>The difference in dates is too great in this case but another factor might
>be the Gregorian calender vs. Julian.
>Jerry Frank - Calgary, Alberta
>jkfrank at shaw.ca
>Ger-Poland-Volhynia mailing list
>Ger-Poland-Volhynia at eclipse.sggee.org

More information about the Ger-Poland-Volhynia mailing list